![]() ![]() The newly initialized repository created results in a default master branch. With this example, we'll take the next step and make a commit to production in a basic workflow. Up until this point, you have created an entire folder representing your project with great potential. and tie all of the interface and concepts together to perform work on your repository. Once your repository is initialized and the interface is out of the way, it's time to get cracking. When you change branches, pull in changes, or reset, GitKraken will update the files in the working directory to reflect the changes.įor more information on Git repositories, check out the Git repository tutorial blog post including a video from one of our developers. The working directory is the currently checked out version of the files in the local repository. This contains all of the information required for the Git repository and if this folder is deleted, you would no longer be able to switch branches, pull from remotes, or view commit history. ![]() When initializing a Git repo or cloning from a remote, you will notice a .git folder in the project root. It also means if there is a catastrophic event on the remote server, or if another user makes an unwanted change on a remote, all of the other members of the team would still have a copy of the full repo so it can easily be restored.git folder The local repository includes all of the branches, and changes made to the repo, since the time it was created.īecause you make a copy of the entire remote repo, you can change branches, view history, and commit changes without needing a network connection. One of the reasons why Git is so fast when compared to other SCM tools is because all changes are made locally rather than on a remote server. You can easily identify any local branches in the graph as they are shown with the icon. In Git, with Sourcetree or GitKraken, you can easily see a file's history without having to checkout the whole project from a previous commit.Most of the work you do in GitKraken is using the local repository, meaning the files and changes are saved on your local machine. Unless I'm mistaken, with Collaborate it seems like I'd have to first commit all current changes, then restore an older commit to get the whole project as it was in that older state, then open the file to view the content at that time. I noticed there were other comments on the blog with concerns about this as well.Īlso, many times I find that I've been making changes to a particular script and then realize I want to view that same script in an older state to see what I had deleted. With Collaborate, how do you envision being able to handle similar scenarios? I guess we could create a new repository for newer versions/features, but then we wouldn't be able to bring in the fixes on the release repository. It would seem very helpful to also be able to bring those fixes in to a branch where new features are being worked on. ![]() I was thinking about things like how branching can help with release versions, and trying to issue patches and fixes for those releases while working on new features. I noticed on the Unity blog post a while ago that after some testing and feedback, branching would not be included. I'm about to upgrade to Beta19, but just wanted to say that after trying out Git, Mercurial, and PlasticSCM (which all have their advantages/disadvantages), it's nice to have a form of version control integrated in the editor, so thanks! Hi, I've been using Collaborate with Beta17 without any problems. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |